Author Topic: How hard would it be to...  (Read 1135 times)

Yager200i

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
    • View Profile
How hard would it be to...
« on: April 25, 2015, 02:34:46 AM »
Hi, all.

I had an idea just now, I don't know, it might be crazy...

As background, I'll be reworking my engine. Ceramic coating on piston crown, valves, head and intake/exhaust ports, hybrid ceramic bearings, roller lifters to replace the flat tappet lifters (and a new cam with faster lift and seat, and slightly longer open duration), and hopefully (eventually) a Desmodromic valve actuation setup to get rid of the power waste of having to compress those valve springs 4600 times per minute at WOT, with the Desmo cam grind using the parameters of the new roller lifter cam grind.

So, how does one find the perfect cam grind to maximize fuel efficiency? For such a small engine, it'd be pretty hit-or-miss (pardon the engine pun).

Unless... if one were to remove the camshaft entirely, and mount a modified valve cover on the engine with large solenoids that would actuate the valves. The solenoids would be driven by control circuitry that would let one vary the intake and exhaust valve opening and closing to achieve maximum fuel efficiency as the engine ran in a test stand.

Likewise, the spark would be controlled such that one could advance / retard the spark timing.

The rear drive axle would be coupled to an alternator that would act as load (so the entire drive train including the CVT is included in the tweaking, for maximum realistic effect), feeding a large resistor-based load bank. An Arduino controller would automatically vary throttle position, valve timing, spark timing, fuel injector duty cycle and alternator load while monitoring power output and fuel consumption to achieve maximum power output with minimum fuel consumption.

This wouldn't be a permanent setup... just to tweak the valve timing and spark timing so the new ECU could be properly programmed and the new cam ground.

So, the Arduino would start the engine, tweak for maximum fuel efficiency at idle, then step up to the engine RPM to where the clutch engages, do the same, step up 500 RPM, etc., etc., all the while compiling the results into a database so the data can be transplanted into a permanent setup later.

What do you think? Doable?

BettinANDlosing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2235
  • Carter Merz
    • View Profile
    • Columbia Scooters
Re: How hard would it be to...
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 04:39:32 AM »
I think I figured it out, Bill Gates is your uncle right? Whatever you do for a living, i want in.
2002 Kymco B&W 300; MRP 78MM "300CC", Naraku cam, Yoshimura rS3 exhaust, 17g Sliders, Yellow torque spring drilled airbox, stock carb #115 main #40 pj.

2001 "Yamaha" Zuma AKA MBK Booster; MHR OverRange, Dellorto 19mm BHBG, Polini "big" intake, RS-3 Rear shock, Stock cylinder.

mrbios

  • 2005 Kymco Grandvista 250cc
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 619
  • Just crusing along on my 2005 GV250
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: How hard would it be to...
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2015, 04:16:30 PM »
I think I figured it out, Bill Gates is your uncle right? Whatever you do for a living, i want in.

Same here.  Ceramic pistons?  Golly.  I just figured out how to reinstall the air caps on my tires.
PaulC

0BARK4322

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: How hard would it be to...
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2015, 10:47:24 PM »
They are already using that on the 2014/2015 scooter..............
ALL STOCK

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function split()